Krebs on Security

In-depth security news and investigation

Brian Krebs

  • About the Author
  • About this Blog
  • Forcing Flash to Play in the Sandbox

    Adobe has released a public beta version of its Flash Player software for Firefox that forces the program to run in a heightened security mode or “sandbox” designed to block attacks that target vulnerabilities in the software.

    Sandboxing is an established security mechanism that runs the targeted application in a confined environment that blocks specific actions by that app, such as installing or deleting files, or modifying system information. The same technology has been built into the latest versions of Adobe Reader X, and it has been enabled for some time in Google Chrome, which contains its own integrated version of Flash. But this is the first time sandboxing has been offered in a public version of Flash for Firefox.

    Flash is a big target of attackers partly because it is a powerful program with a huge install base; vulnerability management firm Secunia estimates that some version of Flash is installed in 96 percent of the world’s Microsoft PCs. Windows users can further harden their systems against such attacks by swapping out their current version of Flash for this beta.

    The sandboxed Flash for Firefox — Flash Player 11.2 beta 5 — works with Firefox 4 or later running on Window Vista or Windows 7. The latest build is available here.

    I’ve been using the beta version for nearly two days now without incident on a Windows 7 Firefox 10 install (with Firefox running under Microsoft’s Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit, or EMET). But if you do experience glitches or compatibility issues, you can always revert back to the non-sandboxed version. If you decide to try the beta, make sure to uninstall the current version using Adobe’s Flash uninstaller tool; then grab and install the beta.

    Bookmark and Share

    Related posts:

    1. Critical Flash Player Update Plugs 11 Holes
    2. Security Fix for Critical Adobe Flash Flaw
    3. Flash Update Plugs 18 Security Holes
    4. Adobe Warns of Attacks on New Flash Flaw
    5. Time to Patch Your Flash

    Tags: Adobe Flash sandbox, EMET, Flash uninstaller tool, Google Chrome, Microsoft's Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit

    This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 7th, 2012 at 2:20 pm and is filed under Latest Warnings, Security Tools, Time to Patch. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    23 comments

    1. Mangix
      February 7, 2012 at 3:18 pm

      curious about EMET. what settings do you run it at? for me, DEP is set to always on, SEHOP to opt out, and ASLR to opt in. haven’t had any issues with this configuration. would like to go ASLR Always On but being a gamer…

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down1
      • David
        February 8, 2012 at 9:56 am

        I use DEP opt in, SEHOP always on, ASLR opt in.

        I then use the ‘Configure Apps’ feature for Firefox with all options selected. I’ve never had any problems with this apart from it being incompatible with Trusteer Rapport, which my bank keeps pushing.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down0
    2. batsec
      February 7, 2012 at 4:08 pm

      A good progress. And I recommend sandboxie to everyone it’s a must have, can protect your computer against a lot of viruses, spyware, etc. ;)

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up5 Thumb down2
      • t_a_forrester
        February 7, 2012 at 4:12 pm

        Sanboxie is a great program. Don’t go online without it!

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up3 Thumb down0
        • SFdude
          February 8, 2012 at 11:00 am

          another +1 for Sandboxie.
          Long-time user in XP-SP3.

          Wish there was a way
          to run XP-SP3 in Sandoxie,
          inside Linux UBUNTU….

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down0
          • TJ
            February 8, 2012 at 11:56 am

            Not sure if this is what you’re looking for, but you can easily run Windows XP SP3 via a virtual machine inside Ubuntu. I do it all the time.

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up2 Thumb down0
            • SFdude
              February 8, 2012 at 6:58 pm

              Thank you TJ!

              Will try to use XP-SP3
              in VirtualBox, (inside Ubuntu)…

              Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down0
      • Neej
        February 8, 2012 at 2:24 am

        Or there’s Comodo Firewall (available at no cost) which can be setup to prompt the user about whether to run any application in a sandbox and remember the choice for any future execution of a given file.

        Personally I find the Defense+ (read premptive malware blocker) to be far to intrusive when I’m using Comodo Firewall and Comodo Antivirus is just godawful, no other way to describe it, but disable or don’t install these two features and it’s a great software firewall and sandbox combination IMO.

        I’m basing my assessment of it’s firewall capabilities off actual testing by third parties BTW, I don’t know of anything similar for sandboxing software though.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up2 Thumb down1
    3. Carl Mitchell
      February 7, 2012 at 4:18 pm

      So Adobe, authors of the least secure software in existence, are adding a sandbox to secure their least secure software. And we expect this sandbox to magically be well coded and secure, because Adobe’s track record on that front is ever so good.

      Also, Comodo internet security (free for home/personal use) includes sandboxing for arbitrary applications.

      Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up10 Thumb down14
    4. Scott
      February 7, 2012 at 4:29 pm

      A step in the right direction.

      Thanks Brian as always for keeping us on top of all things Security related! Great reporting!

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up12 Thumb down1
    5. Jay Wocky
      February 7, 2012 at 7:35 pm

      Am I right to infer that this Flash beta will not work on an XP system?

      Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up4 Thumb down4
      • David
        February 8, 2012 at 10:05 am

        Yes.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down0
    6. Nic
      February 7, 2012 at 10:45 pm

      Too little too late. HTML5 video is here and now.

      Every day from here on out, Flash’s userbase will dwindle, bit by bit. There are more Flash users today than there will be tomorrow, and fewer the next day. And for security that’s a good thing.

      Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up4 Thumb down9
      • Neej
        February 8, 2012 at 2:28 am

        Yeah sure. Until there’s a large number of people using HTML5 maybe …

        Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up7 Thumb down2
        • bob
          February 8, 2012 at 4:28 am

          Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

          There already are. All the major browsers have supported it for a while. Most ‘phones support the interesting bits. The next iteration of our webapp will have no flash at all. All the graphically intensive stuff will move to HTML5 and related tech. An easy win on Apple mobile devices and a more subtle win regards everything else (skill set focus, storage reduction, bandwidth reduction, fewer duplicate code bases, etc).

          Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up4 Thumb down10
      • Scarab
        February 8, 2012 at 9:42 am

        Unfortunately, you’re mistaken. I will not redo ANY of my apps/sites in HTML 5. Too costly and time consuming and I’m sure I’m not the only one that feels this way.

        Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up8 Thumb down1
        • Nic
          February 8, 2012 at 3:01 pm

          Youtube has been publishing HTML5 videos for quite a while now. I can browse Youtube without even having Flash installed. :)

          That’s at least half of all online videos right there. Flash’s demise is a done deal. It’s less important today than it was yesterday. But you can continue using Flash if you prefer.

          BTW if you want to convert your flash videos to HTML5, a simple one line shell script would do it for most people. A simple sed or python script could then change all html pages across an entire site.

          Done, easy. Far and away more secure. How could one on this blog argue against it?

          Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up4 Thumb down7
    7. geeknik
      February 7, 2012 at 11:24 pm

      Waiting on the 64bit version since I run a 64bit version of Firefox 13a1.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down0
    8. george
      February 8, 2012 at 4:09 am

      Interesting. I see on the download page you linked to Adobe decided to call this sandboxed version “Incubator” ?
      Also there is no word from them if an ActiveX version is going to be released and neither if non-ActiveX browsers (such as Opera) will be supported.
      Personally, I hope we have to put up with this software for 1-2 years more before enough websites will support html5.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down1
      • David
        February 8, 2012 at 10:09 am

        I presume that ,because of Internet Explorer Protected Mode, they don’t think it’s necessary to run the ActiveX in a sandbox.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down0
    9. stvs
      February 8, 2012 at 11:18 am

      Great. Now when will Adobe release a version that sandboxes flash cookies in /dev/null to prohibit tracking. Adobe’s existing settings interface is obscure and absurd, one one suspects that this is intentional.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up1 Thumb down1
      • CloudLiam
        February 8, 2012 at 2:16 pm

        Control Panel is obscure?

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down0
      • Nic
        February 8, 2012 at 3:05 pm

        I hear ya. Expect only more of the same from Adobe.

        Of course there are better options:

        – Mozilla’s BetterPrivacy addon for yesterday and today
        – HTML5 video for today and tomorrow

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up2 Thumb down1