Krebs on Security

In-depth security news and investigation

Brian Krebs

  • About the Author
  • About this Blog
  • Spam Volumes Dip After Spamit.com Closure

    Spam trackers are seeing a fairly dramatic drop in junk e-mail sent over the past few days, specifically spam relayed by one of the world’s largest spam botnets – although security experts disagree on exactly which botnet may be throttling back or experiencing problems.

    According to M86 Security Labs, the volume of spam has dipped quite a bit, approximately 40 percent since the beginning of the month by the looks of the graphic the company publishes on its site (pictured at right).

    M86 says the decrease in spam is due to a rapid drop in activity from the Rustock botnet (see graphic below left), a collection of spam-spewing zombie PCs that experts say is responsible for relaying about 40 percent of all junk e-mail on any given day.

    The decline in spam volume comes at about the same time that the world’s largest spam affiliate program — spamit.com — said it would stop paying affiliates to promote its online pharmacy Web sites — on Oct. 1.

    Bradley Anstis, vice president of technical strategy for M86, said the most likely explanation is that the person(s) operating Rustock rented the botnet to a number of spamit.com affiliates, and many of those affiliates have not yet switched over to another pharmacy affiliate program.

    “To me, that’s the most logical explanation,” Anstis said. “The timing certainly hooks up well, because we started seeing this decline right around the first of October.”

    Several other spam watchers said they also were seeing the decline in junk e-mail, although they attribute it differently. Dmitri Alperovitch, vice president of threat research at McAfee, said his company’s sensors were attributing the drop in spam to a decline in activity from the Pushdo botnet.

    Alperovitch said McAfee is seeing a 45 percent drop in the number of Pushdo-infected PCs sending spam spam since Oct. 1, and 27 percent decrease in overall spam levels since that same date.

    The dispute over which botnet may be responsible for the missing spam is interesting because it dovetails with a discussion I had last month with a Russian source who has close contacts to many key players in the cybercrime underground. I had asked this source if he could connect me to the author of Rustock, and while my source couldn’t secure me an interview, he related the following tidbit from their conversation: He said the guy was amused because M86 was consistently conflating Pushdo and Rustock infections — effectively giving his Rustock botnet credit for spam that was being sent by Pushdo.

    M86′s Anstis said his team would be checking their methodologies to make sure they weren’t misclassifying the spam sources.

    “As security vendors, we try to work out which ones are most active and which ones we should concentrate on,” Anstis said. “In the end, the only person who is going to know who is sending what is the botnet authors.”

    Update, Oct. 6, 5:13 p.m. ET: M86 said they re-checked their information after my story ran. Here was their response:

    “We have also seen a drop since Sunday in Pushdo but not at the level of the Rustock drop. We are sure we have these labeled correctly, for example we saw the drop in just Pushdo last month when some of its controllers were taken offline. We still have no Rustock spam in our traps and since these traps come from many different sources we find it hard to believe that just we were blacklisted. We have double checked all our settings and algorithms, we were the first vendor to start reporting on spam bot traffic and we are positive that we have these labeled correctly.”

    Bookmark and Share

    Related posts:

    1. Researchers Kneecap ‘Pushdo’ Spam Botnet
    2. Spam Affiliate Program Spamit.com to Close
    3. Spam Site Registrations Flee China for Russia
    4. Dozens of ZeuS Botnets Knocked Offline
    5. Spam King Leo Kuvayev Jailed on Child Sex Charges

    Tags: Dmitri Alperovitch, M86 Security Labs, mcafee, Pushdo, Rustock, spamit.com

    This entry was posted on Monday, October 4th, 2010 at 4:27 pm and is filed under A Little Sunshine, Pharma Wars, The Coming Storm. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    11 comments

    1. Jim
      October 4, 2010 at 4:52 pm

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

      I don’t care about McAffe’s opinion or their products.

      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up10 Thumb down23
    2. AlphaCentauri
      October 4, 2010 at 6:04 pm

      My spam dropped briefly, but the mailers have found new affiliate programs and are making up for lost time. I received nearly identical spam from the following IP addresses in the last hour, all to the same email address, all for medpillsom16.com, medpillsom17.com, medpillsom18.com and medpillsom19.com. The Composite Blocklist identifies some as part of the Grum botnet, but most aren’t associated with any botnet yet:
      64.107.79.98
      77.126.48.252
      85.152.238.150
      87.119.226.62
      186.112.32.43
      186.207.104.132
      187.4.241.236
      189.58.22.161
      190.120.97.234
      190.161.127.196
      190.206.127.244
      190.29.129.107
      190.40.68.134
      190.97.90.214
      194.209.131.192
      200.111.195.94
      200.125.105.148
      201.216.41.36
      212.225.142.179

      Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up5 Thumb down4
      • Troy
        October 5, 2010 at 11:41 am

        Nice work Alpha– Brian’s second graph from M86 seems to back up the uptick in Grum’s spam.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up1 Thumb down1
    3. T.Anne
      October 5, 2010 at 2:27 pm

      Great article Brian! It’s great to see more than one side of the story and always interesting when they don’t match up.

      I came across another article this afternoon which actually mentions this post… I think you may have been slightly misquoted – says you suggest M86 is misclassifying… I may have read it wrong, but I thought you said that was McAfree – I missed where you agreed with that theory. Which leads to the question… which one do you think credit goes to?

      http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/spam-volume-way-downbut-why-100510

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up0 Thumb down3
    4. Nogero
      October 7, 2010 at 1:52 am

      Please get rid of that “Welcome Googler” banner at the top of your pages. You have a great blog, and I don’t know why but that stupid banner drives me nuts. Most likely because it is wrong and pumps out that message even if it is wrong. I come here from RSS feed, not google.

      (Sorry to be crabby but I see that and go nuts. At least maybe the web designer could fix it so it is accurate, then I wouldn’t see it every time I come here).

      Great blog. The Best (except that damn “Welcome Googler”).

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up3 Thumb down4
    5. Nogero
      October 7, 2010 at 2:35 am

      Have you ever Googled “Welcome Googler”? Interesting results. Why just look what it did to this guy: http://welcome-googler.posterous.com/

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up4 Thumb down2
    6. King
      October 7, 2010 at 1:06 pm

      It highly depends on which spammers’ lists you’re on. My honeypot account is getting the same ~100-200 per day it’s been getting for years. In fact, if anything, it has increased slightly in the past few months.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up1 Thumb down1
    7. Roshan
      October 13, 2010 at 11:46 pm

      excellent journalism! its a good blow to other emerging spammers as well.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up3 Thumb down0
    8. Fraser Guy
      October 16, 2010 at 10:07 pm

      Latest Tues update of Microsoft caused my system to freeze up. I restored and all worked again. Re-updated and same thing happened!
      Restored again. Now am ambivalent about the updates.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up1 Thumb down2
      • Brian Krebs
        October 16, 2010 at 10:32 pm

        Do you know which patch caused the problem?

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up3 Thumb down0
        • Fraser Guy
          October 17, 2010 at 7:00 pm

          Sorry, I did not have time to install them one by one to detect the culprit.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up2 Thumb down0